Governance & impartiality
Governance and impartiality
A credible quality process needs accountable people, declared interests and a decision that can be explained.
Decision safeguards
- Separate review and decision. The reviewer assesses the evidence; a different authorised person makes the accreditation decision.
- Declare conflicts. Reviewers and decision-makers disclose employment, financial, family and consulting relationships. A person with a material conflict does not handle that application.
- No success-based fees. Fees and remuneration are not conditional on an award. Paid consulting must not influence an accreditation decision.
- Record the reasoning. Retain the assessed framework version, evidence references, findings, corrections and signed decision.
- Provide independent reconsideration. An appeal is handled by a competent person not involved in the original review or decision.
Reporting and review
The accountable body reviews consistency, complaints, material conflicts and standards at least annually. Reviewers and decision-makers have defined responsibilities. Advisers and cooperation partners do not receive decision-making authority through their association with CQASE.
Legal identity
CQASE stands for Council for Quality Assurance & Standards in Education. Operator registration number: 22241400. Contact and service information are available on the terms and legal information page.
